Showing posts with label vaccine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccine. Show all posts

18 April 2021

COVID, Clots and Platelets

COVID, Clots and Platelets

The very rare occurrence of death due to "blood clots following vaccination by AstraZenica's anti SARS-CoV-2 vaccine” (hereafter BCfAZV) is rightly causing concern. It is quite hard to get these rare events into perspective. Not from want of information; the authorities are being exemplary in the amount and clarity of the information they publish. No; it is more the amount of information, its complexity, and the repetitive nature of media coverage laced with strange medical terms that wears you down. And the very “rarity” of rare events is hard to grasp.


Platelets

We are told that these vaccine-induced clots are of a rare type — showing low or very low platelet count. Platelets (also called ’thrombocytes’) are blood cells charged with the job of clotting, and blocking the leakage of blood from blood vessels [1]. Too few platelets (a condition called thrombocytopenia) might indicate potential failure to clot; as when taking too much Warfarin. But in the thrombocytopenia following viral infection it seems that ‘something’ has triggered platelet-activation; the platelets cluster, stick, and die. Clusters of dead/dying platelets can break free and flow in the blood till they reach a narrowing, and block the flow. That is the danger. The remaining blood is depleted of thrombocytes/platelets.


Virus-induced Thrombocytopenia 

A somewhat lowered platelet count (< 100 × 10^6/mL blood) has been observed following a number of viral infections, including hepatitis B (and C) viruses, cytomegalovirus, Varicella zoster virus, HIV, and the arboviruses zika and dengue. In this latest COVID-19 pandemic it is found in up to one-third of COVID  patients, so we can add wild-type SARS-CoV-2 to that list of viruses that induce thrombocytopenia. 

One suggested explanation of the vary rare occurrence of BCfAZV is that after vaccination one or two patients go on to contract COVID, though (to date 2021-04-17) the diagnostic viral RNA has not been detected by PCR [2 (page 37)].

Abnormal clotting can be a factor in the pathology of pandemic and seasonal ‘flu (due to influenza A(H1N1) and other viruses)[3]. In these cases the mechanism may be different, may involve proteases, and pre-disposing genetic polymorphisms in complement proteins. But I flag it because there are a few cases, for that virus disease also, where it seems that it was vaccination that triggered the activation of the platelets.


Rare Events

An early response to the suggestion that the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine causes blood clots was to point out that clots do occur at a similar frequency without vaccination [4,Thromboembolism and the Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine: side-effect or coincidence?]. The annual incidence of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is said to be between 2 and 5 per million people [5]. Recent data (as of 4th April 2021) from the 34 million people who have just received the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine are: 169 cases of thrombus in the cerebral venous sinus, and 53 with thrombi in the splanchnic vein. If we restrict ourselves to the cerebral venous sinus, that is 4.97 per million. An observed/expected ratio of 4.97/ 5 is obviously not significant; until you realise that these blood clots occurred within 7 - 30 days of vaccination. So the observed rate could be 12 - 40 times the expected rate.

          Some commentators have tried to picture the “5-in-a-million” risk by talking of the risk of a fatal traffic accident on our roads, though that is yet another complicated question. In 2019 there were 1752 fatalities in the UK (population=67 million), which corresponds to 26.5 deaths per million citizens per year [11]; though road-death risk is clearly lower for some and therefore higher for others. 

To what new antigens are vaccinees exposed?

The RNA vaccines expose the recipient to the expressed SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and to phospholipid; that is to say, they are rather “pure”.

The AstraZenica vaccine carries DNA for the viral spike protein, together with coding for a 36 aa portion of tissue plasminogen activator leader sequence, plus DNA for all the components of the Chimpanzee Adenovirus vehicle (ChAdOx-1), plus the Adenovirus proteins themselves. (The choice of a replication-incapable Chimpanzee virus instead of a human strain as the vehicle was presumably so that it would be very unlikely that the recipient would already have circulating antibodies against the inoculum.) 

The Johnson & Johnson (= Janssen) vaccine uses human Adenovirus HAdV-D26 as vehicle. (There are over 80 different strains of human Adenovirus known, grouped into species (A, B, C, D, etc.)) Fewer doses of this Janssen vaccine than of the AstraZenica one have been administered to date, but a case of abnormal clotting following injection has now been reported [6].  

Human Adenovirus vehicles have been used since 2000 in exploratory experiments on gene therapy, and quite a lot of the resulting interactions between virus and host are well known. Thus, it is known that Adenovirus injected into a blood vessel rapidly binds to platelets [7], and coagulation factors in the blood [8][9]. 


Why, then, is fatal clotting so rare?

If Adenovirus vehicles normally interact with platelets and coagulation factors, why is the problem of thrombocytopenia and clots-in-veins so rare? One possibility is that there may be a rare genetic polymorphism in the human population that predisposes carriers of that rare genotype to full-blown platelet activation, and clots [10]. A second suggestion is that, when a nurse is giving 300 intramuscular injections in a morning, an occasional needle might pierce a blood vessel, and administer an intravenous injection by mistake [10].  

        The AstraZenica vaccination is still safer than road travel.


References

[1] https://www.verywellhealth.com/thrombocyte-what-is-a-thrombocyte-797228

[2] https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/prac-recommendation/signal-assessment-report-embolic-thrombotic-events-smq-covid-19-vaccine-chadox1-s-recombinant-covid_en.pdf

[3] Pediatr Nephrol. 2018; 33(11): 2009–2025.

[4] The Lancet, Vol. 397, Issue 10283, pp.1441-1443, April 17, 2021.

[5]  https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/prac-recommendation/signal-assessment-report-embolic-thrombotic-events-smq-covid-19-vaccine-chadox1-s-recombinant-covid_en.pdf  

[6] DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2105869

[7] https://jvi.asm.org/content/81/9/4866

[8] https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1873-3468.13649

[9] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009923/

[10] https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/prac-recommendation/signal-assessment-report-embolic-thrombotic-events-smq-covid-19-vaccine-chadox1-s-recombinant-covid_en.pdf 

[11] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/922717/reported-road-casualties-annual-report-2019.pdf


(Please comment directly to cawstein@gmail.com) 

25 March 2021

Vaccines, Lock-downs and Passports

 Vaccines, Lock-downs and Passports

Effect of Vaccines

     Our colleagues on the continent seem to be looking to the vaccines as a way of curbing a rampant spread of the virus. It might be worth pointing out that in Great Britain there was no discernible beneficial effect of the vaccination programme on daily new cases; only on daily deaths, which they have enormously reduced. What is needed to curb in infection is stricter lock-down.

     From 5th Jan 2021 till 28th Feb the semi-log plot of Log10 (daily cases) shows a monotonic decline with a halving time of 17 days. Since 1st March there seems to be a new slower rate of decline -- t(0.5) = 125 days. The epidemiological R number must be getting very close to 1.0. Perhaps this is the result of a return of children to schools,  or perhaps a general relaxation of vigilance; an unexpected negative effect of vaccination. (See my previous posts to understand these calculations.)

Fig. 1 Plot of Log (base 10) of daily case vs Days in 2021.

    I was hoping to see a slowing effect on transmission towards the end of January as the numbers of people vaccinated reached 9 million, but perhaps that was naive. The over-75-year-olds were always taking pretty good care of themselves; so the vaccinated people never were the 'spreaders'. They were, however, contributing to the hospitalisations and deaths. 

     Fig. 2 shows a semi-log plot of the logged death data averaged over the preceding 7 days, in order to smooth out the enormous dependence of number on day-of-the-week. There was a lag during January, while the lethal effects of December and Christmas took their toll. But from the beginning of February there has been an accelerating fall in daily mortality. The March data (pink squares) show a halving time of 11.2 days. And the decline is still quickening.  

Fig. 2. Smoothed plot of Log (base 10) of Daily Cases vs Days in 2021

Lock-downs

     Transmission can be controlled quite effectively in the absence of vaccine, but it takes discipline. If everyone took the precautions that the vulnerable and careful people have been taking for the last 12 months, the daily number of new cases should drop suddenly to zero in the space of 5 - 7 days. Britain has never got anywhere near that degree of discipline. 

Vaccine-passports and Lock-down

     There has been some talk of letting people into pubs if they show a card that confirms that they have been vaccinated. Many seem to favour the idea; many are opposed.

     Once everybody in the country has been offered a vaccination, it does not seem necessary to request a passport. Those who wish to remain un-vaccinate will be taking a risk. But that is up to them. They should pose little threat to others who are vaccinated. 

(See also: Variants of Concern
Covid Epidemiology part 5
Pandemic and new variants
SARS-CoV2 Continued
COVID-19 Epidemiology part 2)

02 February 2021

We anxiously watch for the effects of the Vaccines

  We are very proud of and grateful for our dedicated NHS staff. They are working their socks off to get the two vaccines (Pfizer and AstraZenica) distributed where they will (a) save lives, and (b) bring down the number of circulating viruses.

        I have been following the numbers of new COVID-19 cases reported in the whole of the UK each day on the excellent government website. I plot the logarithm of that number against the day. In December 2020, under a confused and heterogenous tiered system, the virus continued to spread; logged data (pink symbols) rise more-or-less monotonically, with a doubling time of 16.3 days. After Christmas new lockdown was imposed. Since 5th January the logged data (blue symbols) fall more-or-less monotonically with a halving time of 16.3 days. (During the first lockdown, in May and June, the falling incidence showed a halving time of 19.8 days, so this January 2021 fall is marginally faster.)
        Vaccination started at 8th December 2020, but till this time (end January) it has been largely confined to the over 70 age group. It is clear that this group, selected as the most likely to die of COVID-19, are not the group most likely to be the main spreaders of the virus.  
The December data (pink squares) show a steady rise, doubling every 16.3 days (rather ignoring Boris’s lockdowns, letups, and tiers, but maybe showing a slight upward curve as the 'Kent' variant spread.).
        So far, the data for the whole of the UK from 5th January fit a fairly steady monotonic decay curve, t½≅16.3days. (See Fig. 1. Remember, I plot (on the vertical axis) log [base 10] of the number of new cases reported on each day relative to 1st Jan 2021 (shown on the horizontal axis). Blue diamonds are January data to 31st inclusive.) I am sure that everyone is hoping to see a distinct acceleration in the decline of these transmission numbers, but that is not yet visible. 


(The preference for ‘reporting cases' on Fridays is very pronounced — 8, 15, 22, 29 in Jan 2021.)

Of course, the over 70 age group are not the major spreaders, So let 
us look at the Logged (and smoothed) data for the number of deaths on 
each day in January. Unfortunately, there is no convincing sign yet of a 
decline in the daily death toll. The data show only a strong dependence 
on the day of the week. Throughout January, Mondays are good days, 
with 2-3 times fewer deaths than found on Wednedays.