24 February 2023

Labour's five missions

What are, and what should be, Labour's five missions?

(Yestersay (23rd February) Keir Starmer announced the five missions that would characterise his government, if elected. Here I comment.)
Dear Team-at-Labour-Headquarters,
    Those are five admirable objectives, so far as they go. But it strikes me that they are likely very similar to the five objectives of the Conservative party. 
1. Secure the highest sustained growth in the G7
How? Not by cutting taxes, surely?  nearly all voices clamour for growth. Yet I do not seek growth, if it means more-of-the-same, more concrete, more motor cars). Perhaps we should aim for 'productivity' gains (which benefits everyone), and better distribution of wealth (which would benefit nearly everyone). 

2. Build an NHS fit for the future.
Even an NHS of the past would be quite good. We should try to re-establish morale, certainly, but also cap spending on e.g. expensive operations and expensive medicines, else the image of a 'bottom-less pit' looms. We suggest (again) the 'health-penny' on income-tax.

3. Make Britain’s streets safe.
I suppose again the task is to try to re-establish morale, and public confidence. Do we need to think seriously about management training? Quality circles? The 'Copper-penny' on tax?

4. Break down the barriers to opportunity at every stage.
Which barriers? And how? (You cannot make people intelligent and innovative by sending them to Oxford.) The Tory idea is competition and laissez faire; what is Labour's idea? Apprenticships?

5. Make Britain a clean energy superpower.
Clean – yes! But Superpower? Citizens are happier (more content) in Finland (7.82) and Denmark (7.64) than in any of the G10 "superpowers". Look at the Happiness indices of the G10.
Switzerland 7.51
Netherlands 7.41
Sweden 7.38
Canada 7.03
Germany 7.03
USA 6.98
UK 6.94
Belgium 6.8
France 6.69
Italy 6.47
Japan 6.04

I would like Britons to be happily honest, happily frugal, happily generous, happily good citizens, happily fair.

I would like to see the voting strength of the MPs in parliament match the voting strengths in the country (e.g. by weighted voting in the Commons

Labour may be held back by its past, for it cannot easily chuck the 'Labour' tag with its confrontational approach to labour relations. What about "Ordoliberalism" ? 

Where are Labour's philosophers? The Fabians? The brains? Where, indeed, is New Labour?

Yours sincerely, Ian West (Comments to cawstein@gmail.com)

09 February 2023

Aluminium Metabolism (2)

Some Cellular Effects of Al3+ 


Introduction

As outlined in Aluminium1, it was found that patients on dialysis for kidney failure tended to develop Dialysis Encephalopathy Syndrome (DES), and Dialysis Osteomalacia (DOM). It was further established, unequivocally, that the culprit was an excessive concentration of Al3+ in the dialysis buffer, and hence in the blood. The former syndrome (DES), which in several respects resembles Alzheimer's disease, seemed to result from accumulation of aluminium in the brain; the latter (DOM) to result from competition between Al3+ and Ca2+ at some stage in the bone-forming process. 

If excess serum Al3+ can cause either problem, it seems likely that it could, in some individual cases cause both. Searching the medical literature soon found a report of  the "Impact of Osteoporosis on the Risk of Dementia in Almost 60,000 Patients Followed in General Practices in Germany" [19]  The odd title seems to ascribe the dementia to an effect of the osteoporosis; but the impact is presumably only on the risk of dementia; i.e. it is a merely a correlation. 

How, then, does aluminium act in metabolism, and in particular in dementia? Is Al3+ a cause, or a coincidence?    


Al3+ ion Leads to Oxidative Damage.

It seems generally accepted that the presence of excess Al3+ can cause oxidative damage to cells, probably by generating the superoxide radical (O2∙-), which itself gives rise to  other reactive species such as peroxide, hydroxyl radical, and peroxynitrite. Several mechanism have been suggested: [a] mitochondria can release oxygen radicals, by incomplete reduction of oxygen to water; [b] Al3+ could displace redox-active Fe ions from their complexes; [c] mitochondria are perhaps damaged by sequestration of phosphate as Al3PO4; and [d] by direct formation of superoxide from water molecules co-ordinately bound to the Al3+ atom.

[a] Mitochondria in ischaemic tissue that cannot get sufficient oxygen can develop an excessively reduced respiratory chain, with components at a sufficiently reducing potential to pass a single electron to an O2 molecule. In those circumstances the highly reactive superoxide anion is produced which can go on to react with nitric oxide, phospholipids and other components of the cell [1]. (The transfer of 1 electron to the O2 molecule generates superoxide radical (O2∙-) while the transfer of one electron to the peroxide molecule generates water and the hydroxyl radical (OH).)

[b] The Al3+ and the Fe3+ ions have the same high charge and similar ionic radius (57 and 64 pm respectively). Both Al3+ and Fe3+ ions bind very tightly to transferrin in the blood (logKeq = 22.5 & 21.4, for Fe, while the binding of Al is 10 orders of magnitude less tight [2].  The complexes are carried round the body in the blood plasma, and into iron-requiring cells by endocytosis. The acidic lumen of the endocytotic vesicle releases the trivalent ions.  Al3+ can then compete with Fe3+ for the many compounds in the cell (such as citrate, oxalate, phosphate, acetate) that bind Al3+ more tightly than Fe3+ [3]. There are several metabolites (such as ascorbate) that can reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+. The latter, by the Fenton reaction, can generate the destructive hydroxyl radical and tip the cell into the intrinsic (or mitochondrial) pathway of apoptosis. [4].

[c]  ATP (and ADP) mostly exits in the cytoplasm complexed with Mg2+ [5].  It is said that Al3+ inhibits hexokinase [6], as the Al3+ salt  of ATP is not a substrate. If that were true for transport in the mitochondria of ADP and Pi, the mitochondria in a cell containing Al3+ might enter the hyper-reduced state called state 4., and emit superoxide radicals [7].

[d]  The idea, ventured by  Exley and Lopez and tested in several theoretical studies [8, 9, 10], that Al3+ can generate bound superoxide directly from bound water, may be correct, but may be irrelevant. It is clear that differential binding of Al3+ to the reduced component of a redox couple would make the bound couple appear more easily reduced than the free couple. But in that case, the bound superoxide would not be as strongly reducing as free superoxide. 


Al3+ ion Displaces Mg2+ from ATP, Pi, etc..

As mentioned in [c] above, Al3+ can displace Mg2+ from ATP (and possibly ADP and Pi), under the heading of damage by oxygen radicals. Inhibition of hexokinase, and other reactions involving ATP, could have many wide-reaching effects on the metabolism of the cell including loss of ionic gradients across the cell membrane, and collapse of membrane potential.


Al3+ ion Displaces Ca2+ in the formation of bone.

It is clear, since the discovery of dialysis osteomalacia (DOM), that excess Al3+ in blood causes softening of bones. 

It is also clear that Al3+ ion gets into bone, as  half of the total body content of Al in healthy humans is found in the skeleton (and 25% in the lungs) [6].  It therefore seems clear that Al3+ can compete with and replace Ca2+ at some stage (or stages) in the bone-making process, summarised in the equation below:

10Ca2+ + 6H2PO4- + 2H2O ↔︎ Ca10(H2PO4)6(OH)2 + 14H+


Al3+ ion (probably) binds tightly to nucleophilic oxygen atoms in Nucleic acids and phosphorylated proteins.

The leather-tanning process exploits the tendency of Al3+ to form crosslinks between collagen molecules: RCOO- ...Al3+.....OH-.... Al3+.....O-OCR. And the very tight binding of Al3+ to nucleophilic oxygen atoms in ligands such as orthophosphate, acetate, citrate, and hydroxyl ions make it highly credible that Al3+ would bind to such groups in proteins and nucleic acids. Ganrot's comprehensive (but early) review of "Metabolism and possible health effects of aluminum" [6] suggested that proteins (in general) bind Al3+.  He believed that the tight binding of Al3+ to proteins and nucleic acids would be irreversible and that the ageing human would gradually fill up with aluminium. That has proved very hard to demonstrate.  Brain tissue from donors with neurodegenerative disease contain significantly more Al than control brains; but these control brains show no correlation between Al content and ag [11].  

Famously, the amyloid beta protein (Aβ) of extracellular presenile plaques in Alzheimer's Disease, was said to bind Al3+, though how, where, how tightly and how many are all question that still need clarifying. 

Amyloid, so called as it takes up iodine stain 'like starch', has nothing to do with starch. It represents a misfolded form of any of some 20 different proteins, is characteristic of ageing, is insoluble, and may cause organ failure in a rather passive way [4].  The amyloid of dementia is the result of misfolded peptides (Aβ40,42 ) derived from the Amyloid Precursor Protein, APP.  More about APP and Aβ in a subsequent post.

The other characteristic feature of neurodegenerative dementia is the presence of hyper-phosphorylated Tau-protein in 'neurofibrillary tangles' (NTFs). It is suggested that the phosphorylation of tau causes it to dissociate from intracellular microtubules and migrate to form these intracellular tangles [12].  Both the fibrillar amyloid plaques of aggregated Aβ42 peptide, and the neurofibrillary tangles of  hyper-phosphorylated Tau-protein are primarily β-pleated-sheet structures [13]. 

However, it is not known if Al3+ binding has a causative rôle in plaque formation; for example, by favouring β-sheet structure over 𝛼-helix, though there have been a number of attempts to establish such an effect [14]. Miller et al. detected in amyloid plaques the  amide-1 absorbance of β-sheet and deposits of Cu and Zn, but no Al [15].  Indeed, two recent, deep and thorough reviews on the structure of  "Amyloid beta" [16, 17] make no mention of  Al3+, which seems a strange omission after 40 years of the aluminium hypothesis of dementia. 

A recent paper by the Exley group reported Al3+ deposits in the same cell as neurofibrillary tangles, but in a different location [18].


References.


[1]  Indo et al. (2015) J Clin Biochem Nutr.; 56: 1–7.)

[2]  Ott, D.B. et al. (2019) Metallomics 11(5):968-981;  doi: 10.1039/c8mt00308d.

[3]   Vekeman et al. (2021) Nanomaterials (Basel); 11: 1763; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8308151/

[4]  Wikipedia

[5]  Kiss, T.; Sovago, I.; Martin, R. B. Al3+ Binding by Adenosine 5-Phosphates: AMP, ADP, and ATP. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 2130− 2132.

[6]  Ganrot, P.O., (1986) "Metabolism and possible health effects of aluminium", Environmental Health Perspectives 65, 363-441

[7]  J Bioenerg Biomembr. (1999);31(4):347-66.  doi: 10.1023/a:1005427919188.

[8] Exley, C., (1992) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 13: 79–81

[9] Mujika et al. (2014) https://doi.org/10.5936/csbj.201403002

[10] Lopez (2022) Free Radical Biology and Medicine, Volume 179, 1 February 2022, Pages 200-207.

[11] Exley C, Clarkson E. (2020) Sci Rep. 10(1):7770. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64734-6. 

[12] Siddhartha Mondragón-Rodríguez et al. (2020) Hindi Neural Plasticity, Volume 2020 | Article ID 2960343 | 

[13] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589967/

[14] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7582331/  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Nov 8; 91(23): 11232–11235

[15] Miller et al., 2006, J. Struct. Biol., 155 (2006), pp. 30-37.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878535215001914  

[16] Ow & Dunstan (2014) Protein Sci. 2014 Oct; 23(10): 1315–1331.

[17] Chen et al. (2017) PMC5589967] 

[18]  Mold and Exley (2021) J Alzheimers Dis Rep v.5(1); 2021 PMC8150251

[19]  Kostev, Hadji & Jacob (2018) J. Alzheimers Dis. 65(2):401-407.

03 February 2023

Atmospheric Rarefaction

Rarefaction of the atmosphere at 2249 metres

I like to remark, when back home in England, that in Mexico City the air is appreciably thinner than it is in Northamptonshire, a mere handful of metres above sea level. I feel it shows me as a "travelled man", and a "man of science". But my sense of satisfaction does not last, for a wave of panic quickly follows the wave of conceit. Can I remember, and state with confidence, by how much the atmospheric pressure reduced is in Mexico City, and how much lower is the boiling point of pure water than the familiar figure of 100.0ºC. 

In Mexico City I presumably walk more slowly than I do in Northamptonshire, or breath more rapidly; but how much more slower should I walk to avoid O2-deficit. 

I remember, a few years ago, looking it up on the web during an earlier visit, and writing a small table in my black book of worthy-but-easily-forgotten things (28th Jan 2019). I shall look it all up again, and make some calculation. Perhaps that will fix it.

Feet above
sea level

Metres above
sea level

Oxygen as %
(v/v) of air

Air Pressure 
(mm of Hg)

Air Pressure
(bar)

Boiling point
pure water ºC

0

0

20.9

760

!.000

100.00

 

100

 

 

0.990

 

1000

305

 

733

0.965

99.0

2000

610

 

707

0.9303

98.0

3000

914

 

681

0.896

 

4000

1219

 

656

0.863

 

6000

1829

 

609

0.801

94.0

8000

2438

 

564

0.742

91.9

10,000

3048

 

523

0.688

89.8

CDMX

2249.21

 

578

0.7603

92.55

 

I have interpoated (linearly) between 1829 m and 2438 m to find the standard pressure and boiling point of  water at 2249.21 m (the altitude of Mexico City). I conclude that I have to walk 24% more slowly in Mexico city, or pant gently, taking 16 breaths per minute instead of the standard 12.  

How much longer I should boil an egg is a complex matter, and is more easily solved by trial and error.