24 September 2026

The Tailor at Gelati 8

El Sastre en Gelati 8


I am enjoying my present life in colonia San Miguel Chapultepec, in Mexico City. (I have mentioned elsewhere the abundance of trees [1], and the street-sounds [2].)  

        This colonia (founded 1913) has been described as: 

"The Greenwich Village of Mexico City ..... equal parts urban artsy and quiet residential. Residents are a truly eclectic mix of middle-class singles and families, with a healthy dose of international expats."[3] 


It abuts the enormous Bosque de Chapultepec whose 866 hectares make it the largest urban forest-park in Latin America. 

The fine older houses, single-storied with roof-gardens and courtyards, were built between 1940 and 1980. In the last 20 years, one by one, many of these have decayed or been pulled down to be replaced by anonymous blocks of flats rising to 4 or 5 stories. 

        The colonia is curiously rich in Art Galleries, housing the first (1940) gallery dedicated solely to Mexican Art [3]. Also the large modern Kurimanzutto gallery, besides a dozen others. There are also a considerable number of 'Architecturally Important' buildings, including Luis Barragán’s Casa Gilardi. 

It is also rich in small restaurants that cater for the dining needs of a community of office-workers that probably live at some distance. We sometime go for our mid-afternoon lunch to Casa La Martina, 100 meters NE up our Calle Juan Cano (three courses for MX$165 (£6.6)).(Only in La Martina have I seen a passer-by on the pavement lean in the open window to embrace someone sitting at the window-table. Nor elsewhere have I seen a man rise from his seat so that he could reach across the table to kiss his companion.)  Or  we go 50 paces SW down Cano and round the corner to Gelati 26, where the two of us dined for MX$ 440 (£17.76). But in that 50 paces we pass another small restaurant, a café, a rather fun Vermouth Bar (Vermut Déco), a tiny shop selling quality second-hand clothes, and an even tinier shop advertising Mexican wines. 

However, the building that provoked me to write this piece is further down Gelati toward its junction with the 5-lane Circuito Interior Jose Vasconcelos.

Across the road there is the great Hospital Angeles Mocel.  But we press on down Gelati, heading SE,  past a cheerful man with a little barrow (carrito) selling jelly-babies and sweets made of ground peanuts, or compacted amaranto seeds; past the old man, who regularly sleeps in the door-way of the medical firm Laboratorio Médico del Chopo as soon as it locks its doors for the night, past the larger carretilla at the corner, stocked with a myriad tiny pot-plants, succulents and flowers. These little stalls have wheels, but I do not think they have ever moved in my 12 years.   


In the last block before the junction, the buildings opposite us, on the 'odds' side  of the road, are all decrepit and closed, except for one small restaurant. 

On our side (the 'even' numbers), the buildings are in good condition and the businesses are going concerns. We arrive at Gelati 8, one of the oldest of the single-storied, 1940-vintage, house with yellow-ochre rough-cast and smooth, copper-brown, facings. It is double-fronted around a large central iron door.  I am told there may be several dwellings or businesses inside that door; certainly there are two. And I have once glimpsed an extensive courtyard. On each side of the door there is a large window reaching from floor to near the high ceiling of the room inside, but bricked-in for half its height forming what might be called an implausibly thin balcony; business is transacted over the rim of this brick-walled balcony, with the proprietress looking down on you. 

The left-hand window deals in "bespoke tailoring for ladies and gents, with special prices for alterations"; but if what you want is colour photocopying or ink-jet printing, you go to the right-hand window; you ring the appropriate bell, and when a face appears over the rim of the balcony, you explain your business and pass up your work. 
I have not seen anything like it, neither elsewhere in Mexico City, nor in any other city I have visited in my traveling life. But it gloriously matches the quaintly old-fashioned trades and the elderly, but ageless, quality of their proprietors.

References:
[1] https://occidentis.blogspot.com/2025/10/autumn-leaves.html 
[2] https://occidentis.blogspot.com/2024/02/street-sounds-in-our-colonia.html
[3] https://mexiconewsdaily.com/travel/know-your-mexico-city-neighborhood-san-miguel-chapultepec/ 

21 September 2026

Hope

 Hope

I had been listening, for four days, to my companions talking high-speed Spanish. Though I have been studying it for 12 years now I find it difficult to keep up. Every now and then someone drops a word that I am confident of, like 'estudiantes' or 'medicinas', and I am tempted to offer a contribution of my own to the conversation. After all, I taught students for 30 year, and in a medical school. But while struggling to form a sentence, it became clear that the subject of their conversation had moved on. It occasionally worried me that they might come to think of me as a dull person, but shrugged that off, when I realised that their opinions did not actually affect my capacity, in any way.

On the morning of the fifth day, I was up and dressed before breakfast and I listened to the tail-end of a podcast I had started a few days previously; it was "The President's Inbox" of 9th September 2026, in which James M. Lindsay (host) and Walter Russell Mead (guest) discussed "What the US Got Wrong in the War on Terrorism". Towards the end one or other quoted Solzhenitsyn effectively saying that we all contain good and bad elements, and bemoaning the Black verus White mentality of modern politics, which makes collaboration and compromise very difficult.  Then James Lindsay turned to Walter Mead and asked him to sum up by looking ahead: "What lessons would you hope that (political) candidates...would take away from September 11th. ..". And then followed the most inspiring political concept I had encountered in years. Walter Mead replied:

"Okay. Well, I would say, number one is the importance of preventing bad things before they happen. Think about if the Israelis had prevented the October 7 attacks, if we had prevented 9/11, or if we had deterred Putin's invasions of Ukraine in 2014 and 2022 –– how much better off we would be?". I was thrilled.

So, when we sat round the breakfast table for our last communal meal before dispersing, I took a gap in the conversation to lay out, speaking (I suspect) in English, this far-reaching question., As I contemplated the heavenly possibilities that open before me I was near moved to tears and had trouble controlling my voice. 

A short, discomfited silence followed, then Marie Thérèse said: 

"Yes, but the world is what it is" , which I felt as a devastating 'knock-down' (**) response, but one met, I like to think, by my equally 'knock-down' riposte:

"Indeed, but the world is not what it is becoming", to which she kindly assented. 


(** 'knock-down' in the sense in which the term was introduced by Humpty Dumpty, in "Through the Looking glass", Lewis Carroll, 1872.)


07 September 2026

Taxation, or What?

 Taxation, or What?

My friend, the accountant (see [1]) is not on top-form any more, is not up for another discussion on the need for more effective taxation, and I will have to develope the arguement with myself; or find some editor who will take a risk and share this with the public. 

I established (in [1]) that the money that flows into the pockets of the rich, stagnates there; it does not get spent and, in that process multiply via the recycling mechanism demonstrated elsewhere [2] and called 'the multiplier'. My solution (in [1]) was to tax it back into circulation; taxing in a socially acceptable, progressive, manner. 

Taxation still seems the most obvious way of recycling money back from the wealthy (where it accumulates) to the poor (where is is spent). But it is unpopular. Indeed, it is perhaps the gravest of the several weaknesses of 'liberal democracy' that people tend to vote against taxes. Until the public get educated in these matters it will be resisted.  Thus my accountant friend (see [1]) regarded 'estate tax' (= 'death duty') to be "double taxation", and the exorbitant salaries of the CEOs to be 'fair' by the application of the 'market forces yardstick'.

There are two other lines of argument that I will outline here: Philanthropy, and Fairness. 

In the middle ages the enormous expense of building a church, or a cathedral, or endowing a university, actions that benifit ALL of society, was bourne by the landlords, simply because only they had the money. More recently in the USA, and to a lesser extent in the UK, there was a good tradition of philanthropy. Stanford University was founded (in 1885) by Leland Stanford and his wife, Jane.  Andrew Carnegie founded (1911) his Carnegie Corporation to support  "education, democracy, and peace". (He had already built the Carengie Hall in 1889-91.) Then J.D. Rockefeller founded (1913) The Rockefeller Foundation which supportes public health and medical research. More recently we have the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and in England, the Wellcome Trust. And there are many others. So, we await, and hope soon to see, the public benefits of the Amazon Trust, and the Facebook Foundation, etc.  People who wish to live in society, and share the benefits of society should want to contribute in proportion to their wealth. Progressive taxation should not be necessary. 

Against the argument that 'market forces' justify the enormous wealth of the trillionaires, we may have to look more closely at the notion that impartiality = fairness; reassess the value of work [2]. Is it true that an hour of one man's time is worth (in haman terms) 3 million times the minimum wage, on which millions of other people survive? I think it could be said that e.g. Amazon. com, Inc. is underpaying its staff and its sources. 

References
[1] https://occidentis.blogspot.com/2020/11/paying-taxes-both-virtue-and-necessity.html
[2] https://occidentis.blogspot.com/2026/04/tax-and-spend-2.html
[3] https://conversableeconomist.com/2026/09/07/the-latent-benefits-of-work/

(Please send comments direct to cawstein@gmail.com)