28 July 2025

Six Dimensional Man

                         The Six Dimensional Man

        Our hero, Steve, stood in front of the brown varnished door labelled 'Maker'. Under the label was one of those sliding shutters that allowed only one of two options to be seen: 'IN' or 'OUT'. It showed 'IN'. Steve hesitated a moment, took a deep breath and tapped tentatively on the door. A muffled voice called "Come in", so in he went. 

"Complaint or compliment?", asked the duty officer.

"Well, compliments obviously", said Steve "but I have been thinking, and wondered if it would be too bold of me to make a suggestion."

"We mostly get compliments, but you have a suggestion, eh? I don't see why not. Wait here till that red light goes green. You are lucky we are not too busy today."

Steve sat down on the last of a row of empty chairs, near a second varnished door and the red light, and waited while he tried to compose his thoughts.  At last the door slid open and out stumbled a young woman with outstretched hands as in a trance; or as a rabbit might if exposed to a car's headlights. A moment later the light went green and in went Steve. 

The figure before him seemed perfectly familiar; in fact very like all the pictures, though somewhat larger than he had expected; fatter, more easy-going, and more smiling. Steve bowed his head a little in unconscious modesty. 

"Well," said the Maker, "I gather you have some ideas. Are you wondering why you only have two legs, perhaps? I often get that."  And he beamed a good-natured smile down on Steve. "I really don't think you would find an extra leg any better; or two, for that matter. Think of sitting down. Where would you put them? Or typing, or playing the piano?"

"No, it wasn't more legs. I think two is just fine, thank you. Brilliant, in fact. It is just that I heard someone say it was possible to have more than three dimensions. Is that really possible?"

"Yes, of course it is. You can have almost as many as you wish. Would you like a fourth dimension; temperature perhaps?  That would perhaps make you feel more distinguished, feel you had one more degree of freedom. How would you like that?"

"That is exactly the sort of thing I was thinking of. Wonderful. How would it work?". 

" Just as you and the others can go forwards and backwards, or up and down, so you would be able to get hotter or colder. Not exactly like up and down, for you cannot go very far down in temperature before you get to the bottom. But you can go up without limit. "

"Very interesting," said Steve. "Up is easier than down is it? " and he glanced up for the first time to catch the trace of a blush on the Maker's face, who sat for a few moments at his desk playing with a paperknife.

"Give it a try", suggested the Maker. "I do not think you will find that to be a serious limitation; most people prefer moderately warm temperatures. You can come back next week if it does not do the trick."

Steve, overcome with a feeling of blessedness, thanked the Maker, and left. Out in the street he looked around him. Would his fellow citizens realise his distinction? He popped into a stationers and had some cards printed 'Four dimensional man' followed by his name and address. These he would give out whenever he got into conversation with somebody he judged able to appreciate the implications. 

On one such occasion the recipient, after hearing the explanation, looked at the card a second time, and said: "But I think I also have a temperature; I use this little thermometer, and can find the numerical value of my temperature in centigrade or absolute degrees, whenever I want."

Steve was back outside the brown varnished door at the same time on the following week. He was admitted again and greeted again with the same grace and genial good humour.

"Dissatisfied?" asked the Maker. 

"No, no; very satisfied" said Steve. "It is just that I find a number of people also have a temperature, and was wondering if I could have something a tad more esoteric. You said one could have almost as many dimensions as one wanted."

" Sure thing; no problem. What about 'Glow', or 'Spin'? They are a little more esoteric. ".

"Yes, those sound intriguing. Do tell me what they govern?"

"Well, 'Glow' governs happiness. You can travel from very, very unhappy to very, very happy. Once again there is a limitation, I am afraid; you cannot get away from the mean. You cannot always be happy. 'Spin' is a bit more mysterious.  You cannot have two bodies in the same place if they have the same spin; but you can if they have opposite spins. It works well in some long-term marriages."

"I shall try that one, if I may", and Steve left the presence as delighted as he had been the previous week. He asked the stationer if he could cross out the word 'Four' and over-print with 'Five', but was persuaded to scrap the old cards and start with some new ones. 

With his Spin he felt he was getting closer to his dream-world of sub-atomic mysteries. But he was still not completely satisfied. He felt he was still a long way from being able to be in two places at once.  Nor could he be alive and dead at the same time; though admittedly that was not a high priority in his dream world, except perhaps as a stunt. 

So he turned up again at the now-familiar door and, as before, was admitted to the antechamber; and there he waited as before, until the red light went green and he was allowed into the presence.

"How goes it with Spin", he was asked. 

" Oh, fine! Yes, quite fine, thank you. It turns out my wife and I do not get on all that well, so it is not as much use as it might have been. Do you know anything about alternative universes". 

" Not much" admitted the Maker. "We could try reversing 'Time' for you. Before the Big-Bang and the origin of this universe there was another universe exactly like this one, only the mirror image, as it were."

"What about the multiverse?" asked Steve. 

"Oh that's just a theory, and probably a wrong one." The Maker gave a chuckle, before modestly adding "In my opinion." 

"Oh," said Steve, in naïf admiration at the straight-forward frankness of his Maker. "Do explain –– please."

  "Well, you know how a single electron can go through two adjacent slits at once, and give an interference pattern. You might well ask how a single entity and a single instance can give a  probability pattern. One possible explanation  is that the one electron in one instant is really present simultaneously in a hundred or more parallel universes. So you can talk of an average position, or a probability. But that interpretation depends on the Quantum Theory being right,  and I am not sure it is. "

  "Is there an alternative theory?" asked Steve.

"Well, yes, there are several, as a matter of fact; for example David Bohm's 'Hidden Variable' theory. If you knew the value of that hidden parameter, the electron's  initial state would not be indeterminate, and nor would any of its subsequent states. But this is very new stuff, you know. Not confirmed."

"I wouldn't mind testing out a hidden variable, if you like", Steve offered. 

"I think it would be very unwise to tinker with anything you do not fully understand", said the Maker.  But for Steve the idea of a new batch of business cards bearing the words 'Six Dimensional Man' had already seized his mind; he could think of nothing else. 

"Please", said Steve, then added "if you can", which provoked a slight frown on the previously bland face of his Maker. 

Out on the street he gave a skip of sheer delight, and hastened off to the stationer. The next day the stationer brought the neat box of new cards to Steve's house, but Steve's wife explained that she had not seen her husband since the previous evening. 

        And indeed, Steve was never seen again. Not around town and, as far as we know, not anywhere. 

 

25 July 2025

De l'Amour

 De l'Amour

Max and I sat sipping wine in my conservatory as the light slowly faded.

"So," I asked, "what do you say when your girlfriend says she loves you and asks if you love her?'"

"Huh!" he shrugged, "Of course I murmur something about me loving her too. But in truth I am thrown into confusion."

"Even panic" I replied.  "What is love, anyway? I am not sure if I have ever experienced love. Fondness, liking, friendship, familiarity, I know all these. And wanting something, desperately; like a boy for a bicycle, or a girl for a pet.  I rotated my glass by its stem, tilted it and sniffed the heavy vapour. "How would I know love if I had it? Is love the same for everyone?  etc, etc."

"Is love perhaps a female thing?" Max asked.

"Oh yes!  I can see why a girl might want to know, of her man, the level of his commitment, as it is she who might have to carry the consequences.  Fair enough, but how on earth can admitting or claiming to be in love convince anyone of anything?"  

Max agreed. 

"Are there no other signs? More reliable ones. Perhaps a distracted air, dilated pupils, or something in the gait? Perhaps someone could devise a test kit; a colour-changing dip-stick. I am sure there would be a market for that."  

"You might think", suggested Max, "that bringing a bunch of flowers should be enough; if they are red ones."

"Come on Max, you are being frivolous, as you often are. I am being serious about this, as is my wont. Some sixty years ago I read Stendhal's 'De l'Amour', but I never got much into it, nor much out of it. All I remember at this distance is his concept of 'Crystallisation'; the way additional virtues accrue spontaneously to the 'love-object'; as salt crystals grow in the saturated atmosphere of a salt-mine."

"All the great essayists treat of 'Friendship'; do not some also consider love?". I believe I have read Montaigne on 'Friendship', and Emerson, and Francis Bacon."

"We can soon test that idea", I said, getting up. I returned in 2 minutes with those three authors, as well at Marcus Aurelius's 'Thoughts', Stendhal's 'De l'Amour', and Plato's 'Symposium' . 

The 'Symposium' I waved at Max, saying "I think Aristophanes here got as close to my understanding about love as any of them. He covered both the aspect of looking for  your soul-mate, and Nature's canny trick of so positioning the genitalia that procreation is the unintended consequence. 

"Then what is left to discover?" asked Max. "Stendhal covered the business about the progressive distortion of perception as the lover succumbs to his obsession. And Aristophanes propounded the truth that the two fundamental rôles of love are to promote conception, and to improve childcare; for at least a sufficient portion of the population."

"I was coming to a similar conclusion myself," I said. "But I had decided that a common characteristic of love was its lack of reason; so much so that to call an emotion 'love' almost requires the presence of folly. My friend writes to me from Colombia that she will fly back to sit at my bedside while I recover from my operation. 'No, no,' I protest, 'you were here only a month ago; when I am fit I shall come to Bogota.' What, I ask you, could be sillier than that exchange?". 

"Would you really go to Bogota?"

     "Yes I would. And that is how, for once, I feel I can honestly tell her that I love her. " 

 




 Dear Nick Robinson, 

    Re interview with David Mencer at 08:15, 2025-7-25

    I think there was a crucial point in David Mencer's argument that you did not address. It is a point important in understanding the Israeli attitude and in interpreting the Israeli statements. It seems that the Netanyahu line is that Hamas is illegal and can be ignored because it is a terrorist organisation. They seem to regard the whole population as in support of the Hamas fighters, and therefore ligitimate targets. Hamas is, of course, also the democratically elected government of Gaza, which seems to be a point that Netanyahu does not accept.

    I think it could be argued that Israel is also a terrorist organization. They have murdered many more non-combatants than Hamas has, and with the deliberate intention of intimidating the crowd; and that comes very close to what I understand by the term 'terrorist'. (Pouring paint into an aero-engine does not terrify anyone!)  Of course, Hamas zealots started this round of violence. But there seems to have been plenty of unprovoked aggression by Israeli settlers on the Left Bank. I do not think it profitable to use the term 'terrorist' regarding either party. 

    I think we would like to know, from the relatively impartial UN operatives, what the hold up is really due to. Perhaps UN aid workers refuse to carry food when they get shot at by Israeli soldiers; which seems understandable. Perhaps the UN authorities take the view that Hamas should be the distributors as they are the legal authority, and Israel therefore refuses to allow the UN access to the food. Also understandable, given the two mindsets.

    You started off quite well: "Let us agree the undeniable fact of starvation."  But then your desire to embarrass Mencer blew up in your face. Your tiff prevented us learning what is the the cause of the blockage. 

    I think it is time to debate publically and explain more fully why Britain has not recognised the state of Palestine – an area under British 'protection' until it became ungovernable in 1948. I do not think that Israel has shown itself to be a sufficiently grown-up authority to have jurisdiction over so many other human beings; beings which the rest of the world regard as human, but which the Israeli State does not accept as equal. 

Yours sincerely, Cawstein, 
Middleton Cheney,  Banbury,
OX17 2NB  

06 July 2025

The Terrorist

  The Terrorist.

"Awake, awake", the watchman cried, "fire, fire",

 As out into the night he stared with anxious eyes.

 His pedestrian friend turned to him, with calming voice, 

Bade "Hush!  They sleep within; and haply dream of profit; or of love."


The excited watchman turned away in scorn. "Can thinking men, 

Content themselves with hopes and dreams?" 


"No, indeed", his level-headed friend replied, 

"But you scare me, friend, your talk of fire. If, waking now, 

 They heeded well your words, abandoned jobs, laid down their tools, 

 And started for the hills, I think we'd find ourselves starving in the desert 

with five billion hungry mouths.


"Let us calmly plan ahead.

 Perhaps you could devise a scheme to shrink twofold 

In twenty years our number and our wealth; reduce our cars, 

         Our appetites, our needs and wants –– in many steps, 

         Each step being made by choice."

                                                            Ian West, Banbury, July 2025

01 July 2025

The Passing of the Adverb

 The Passing of the Adverb

 Dear Editor of the London Review of Books,

I understand that literary prose enjoys seven kinds of ambiguity; scientific prose (in which I have schooled myself) enjoys none. Your reviewer writes of Syliva Plath,

" – the last line of her probable last poem,"

I do not think Plath's last poem was more probable than any of the others, but I understand that it was probably her last. The rule (that adjectives are qualified by adverbs) enables the reader to know what is being qualified. I regret the vanishing of the adverb. 

I also regret the passing of the conditional tense in sentences like: "Were X to participate, the Red Socks might win". I recently challenged an American editor, who thought his "may win" superior, on the grounds that victory was quite probable. But for me there must always be some doubt about future events, and the "might win" is always to be preferred, in order to make clear what is being asserted, and when. 

    (Similarly with 'can' and 'could'. "If..(whatever hypothetical)......he could win". )

In phrases like "we're convinced", or  "he'd abstain", the replacement of the verb (are?, were?, would?, could?, had?) with an apostrophe removes clarity, albeit transiently. I regret this use of the lazy apostrophe (except when reporting lazy speech). 

I accept that language evolves. But I do not think that educated people should imitate the uneducated merely because the latter are more numerous. 

Yours sincerely, Cawstein.

See also:
[1]  https://occidentis.blogspot.com/2010/06/lazy-apostrophe_7926.html
[2]  https://occidentis.blogspot.com/2016/02/slovenly-apostrophes.html 
[3]  https://occidentis.blogspot.com/2023/10/the-evolving-english-language.html